Already a member?
Sign in
| Version | User | Scope of changes |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 6 2007, 1:54 AM EST (current) | donday | 1 photo added, 1 photo deleted |
| Nov 19 2007, 1:36 AM EST | donday | 13 words added, 1 word deleted, 1 photo added |
Changes
Key: Additions Deletions
Since it's Fall, would this be Pachebel's Canon?
The lens worked well for Joey's portrait--with no highlights off-center, there was no fringing, and his eyelashes are sharp in larger scans.
Jennifer's portrait shows the peculiar, rimmed bokeh of this lens. I think this might be a chromatic issue, especially since it increases away from center. On my next roll, I'll try for some bokeh at about f/4 and see if the fringing goes away.

Abigail was more startled than unhappy here--1/2 second later she was using her little can to harvest leaves, leaves, leaves!
She loves big brother, Ricky--more than he knows.

This was the highlight picture for me--pure joy in Abigail's face as she plunged backwards into the pile:
(large scan--1024x683px)

By now, I needed to crank down to 1/25s. St. Francis is my most patient subject for slow exposures. In larger scans, the fringing effect off his dome looks like he has a bit of a saintly aura. The bird, which I focused on at the near distance of 3.5 feet, is dead sharp (really a credit to Dean Williams' CLA service for me).


As twilight comes, a lesson about how ponds change as winter approaches. Here I switched to a Canon chrome 28mm, f/3.5 @ 1/8s.

So I wonder if any judgment is really needed about the performance of Canon's first fast normal lens. While not as bitingly sharp as the later 50mm f/1.8 bread-and-butter normal lens, it has its own character that leaves me anticipating the next pleasant surprise. I hope you enjoy these dual purpose "lens tests!"
