Already a member?
Sign in
Canon IV, 1950
Since it's Fall, would this be Pachebel's Canon?
The lens worked well for Joey's portrait--with no highlights off-center, there was no fringing, and his eyelashes are sharp in larger scans.
Jennifer's portrait shows the peculiar, rimmed bokeh of this lens. I think this might be a chromatic issue, especially since it increases away from center. On my next roll, I'll try for some bokeh at about f/4 and see if the fringing goes away.

Abigail was more startled than unhappy here--1/2 second later she was using her little can to harvest leaves, leaves, leaves!
She loves big brother, Ricky--more than he knows.

This was the highlight picture for me--pure joy in Abigail's face as she plunged backwards into the pile:
(large scan--1024x683px)

By now, I needed to crank down to 1/25s. St. Francis is my most patient subject for slow exposures. In larger scans, the fringing effect off his dome looks like he has a bit of a saintly aura. The bird, which I focused on at the near distance of 3.5 feet, is dead sharp (really a credit to Dean Williams' CLA service for me).

As twilight comes, a lesson about how ponds change as winter approaches. Here I switched to a Canon chrome 28mm, f/3.5 @ 1/8s.

So I wonder if any judgment is really needed about the performance of Canon's first fast normal lens. While not as bitingly sharp as the later 50mm f/1.8 bread-and-butter normal lens, it has its own character that leaves me anticipating the next pleasant surprise. I hope you enjoy these dual purpose "lens tests!"
Latest page update: made by donday
, Dec 6 2007, 1:54 AM EST
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by donday
1 image added
1 image deleted
view changes
- complete history)
1 image added
1 image deleted
view changes
- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
